By Shira Schoenberg
“Certification through the New England Tech Vets program shows that a company is not just saying they are veteran friendly. It shows they are taking concrete steps to better engage and retain veteran employees,” said retired Navy Rear Admiral Clarke Orzalli who helped design the program, in a statement.
Massachusetts is launching a new tax credit program that will be available to small businesses that hire veterans.
The credit was included in this year’s budget, but businesses will only be able to start the process of becoming eligible for it on Dec. 1.
To get the tax credit, representatives of the businesses will have to undergo an online training program to ensure they are aware of the particular issues facing veteran employees. This will include training related to recruitment, social support and recognizing how wartime experiences affect the workplace.
The Massachusetts High Technology Council, together with military and education-related organizations, has developed the first certified training program called “New England Tech Vets Veteran Ready Employer Education and Certification Program.” The program will be offered for free. Continue reading
By Editorial Staff
If voters approve Proposition 80, scheduled to appear on the statewide ballot next year, Massachusetts’ top capital gains tax rate would go from 30th highest in the nation to fourth and the commonwealth’s highest combined state and federal rate would move from 25th to second, according to a new policy brief published by Pioneer Institute.
“Proposition 80 would have an outsized impact on capital gains,” said Greg Sullivan, the author of “Back to Taxachusetts Series: Capital Gains.” “And one of the few things most economists agree on is that keeping taxes on investment low is critical to economic growth, job creation, and rising wages.”
The ballot initiative would put an additional 4 percent surtax on any annual income over $1 million. Continue reading
By Herald Staff
An alliance of business groups is poking sharp holes in the effort to establish a millionaire’s tax in Massachusetts, arguing in a new lawsuit not just that the proposed constitutional amendment is bad policy (it is) but that it is constitutionally flawed and should not have been certified to appear on the 2018 ballot.
Wealthy people aren’t the only ones who should be grateful for this effort; Massachusetts voters who five times have rejected a graduated income tax now have someone protecting their interests. Same for those who understand that it’s a terrible idea to give high-income earners an incentive to flee for friendlier states. Continue reading
By Marie Szaniszlo
““When you amend the constitution, you prevent the Legislature from touching it. The process of setting taxing and spending policy via amendments will open the floodgates to a series of constitutional amendments,” Anderson said.”
A coalition of business groups yesterday filed suit in the state’s highest court to try to block the proposed “millionaire tax” constitutional amendment from making it on the 2018 ballot.
In a 77-page lawsuit filed in the Supreme Judicial Court, the heads of the Massachusetts High Technology Council, the National Federation of Independent Businesses, the Massachusetts Competitive Partnership, Associated Industries of Massachusetts and the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation challenge state Attorney General Maura Healey’s 2015 certification of the proposed amendment as constitutional.
That certification cleared the way for two votes by the state Legislature — one in 2016, the other in June — to allow voters to decide next year whether Bay Staters should be subject to a 4 percent surtax on any portion of their income that exceeds $1 million. Continue reading
By Greg Ryan
Leaders of five Massachusetts business advocacy groups are asking the state’s highest court to prevent the so-called “millionaires tax” proposal from going before voters, arguing that it sets aside tax revenue in a way that is unconstitutional.
The proposal, which is set to appear on the ballot in November 2018, would raise state income taxes for those making $1 million or more a year by four percentage points. It would reserve those tax dollars for two purposes: transit and schools.
The heads of five of the state’s most high-profile business groups are filing the suit: the Massachusetts High Technology Council, Associated Industries of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, Massachusetts Competitive Partnership and the state chapter of the National Federation of Independent Business.
By John Chesto
“If I were voting on something, I would want to make sure the courts have already reviewed that what I’m voting on is actually constitutional,” said Anderson, one of the plaintiffs.
First, the business groups say, the question improperly links unrelated subjects: a graduated income tax and spending on transportation and education.
Second, they maintain that by dictating how extra tax revenue must be allocated, the initiative limits the Legislature’s ability to decide on spending, violating a state constitutional prohibition on making “specific appropriations” by initiative petition.
Finally, the groups argue that initiative petitions should not be used to take taxation authority away from the Legislature.
By Michael P. Norton
Proponents of an income surtax on high earners face a new challenge as opponents, led by large business groups, are going to court in a bid to derail a constitutional amendment calling for a 4 percent surtax on annual household income above $1 million per year.
A complaint filed with the Supreme Judicial Court Tuesday by officials from the Massachusetts High Technology Council, Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation and Associated Industries of Massachusetts alleges the proposal itself is unconstitutional and violates three requirements and restrictions on the content of ballot questions featured in Article 48 of the state Constitution.
“It is really important to understand that this lawsuit is not about whether creating a new graduated income tax is good public policy or bad public policy, it is about the way that it is being done, which we find to be so clearly flawed and unconstitutional that it is alarming,” Chris Anderson, president of the high tech council and former chairman of the state Board of Education, said in a statement. Continue reading
By Andy Rosen
“Research by the Mass. High Technology Council shows the state has the highest per capita concentrations of science, technology, engineering, and math degrees and also has the highest percentage of workers who hold bachelor’s degrees.”
For years, Massachusetts tech executives have been complaining about how hard it is to fill job openings — that whether they’re looking for a few or 50, there just aren’t enough qualified candidates for companies to grow at the pace they want.
So imagine if one tech company came in and tried to hire 50,000 people.
That’s the potential if Amazon selects Boston for its second headquarters. Overnight, just about every company with a tech focus or IT department would find itself in head-to-head competition with one of the biggest draws in the business. Continue reading
The Missouri Economic Dashboard, believed to be the first economic dashboard launched by a state treasurer, examines state and county financial data in comparison to national averages.
By Theo Douglas
“Christopher Anderson, president of the Massachusetts High Technology Council, which shepherded the Massachusetts’ Technology, Talent and Economic Reporting System (MATTERS) dashboard to its debut in February 2015, told Government Technology that the council’s website appears to have a different goal from the Missouri dashboard.
The Missouri dashboard, Anderson said, “looks more like a thermometer” with its emphasis on comparing the state nationally and on a county-to-county level. MATTERS, he said, was designed as a competitive tool to show Massachusetts its “relative strengths and competitive weaknesses in the context of other states, especially peer states.””
The Missouri Economic Dashboard compares economic data on a county-to-county basis, and contrasts state and national metrics.
Creating an interactive website capable of synthesizing multiple data streams can take years and cost thousands of dollars, but after a roughly eight-month sprint, Missouri debuted what it believes is the first economic performance dashboard launched by a state treasurer. Continue reading
By Priyanka Dayal McCluskey
“We’re talking about a program that has become the dominant feature of state spending,” said Mark Gallagher, executive vice president at the Massachusetts High Technology Council, an employer group. “We have to get serious in addressing the underlying cost drivers.”
Massachusetts legislators, in a showdown with Governor Charlie Baker, again rebuffed his plan to curb the state’s rising health care costs, in part by moving some poor adults off of the state’s health care safety net program.
The Democrat-controlled House and Senate on Wednesday approved a related Baker proposal to raise $200 million a year for the state’s Medicaid program through new fees on employers and use it to help fund health costs. But they rejected a complementary set of proposals to curb spending, which Baker wanted lawmakers to approve as a package.
The governor could accept or veto their decision. It was not immediately clear how he would respond. Democrats in the Legislature have enough votes to override his veto.
The policy dispute between the governor and lawmakers, who generally get along, highlights the immense challenge of helping the poor while keeping public spending in check. It also puts Baker in a difficult spot with the business community, which supports paying new fees only if the state also implements the governor’s cost-cutting plan.
Business groups said Wednesday that they would urge Baker to use the veto. Continue reading